In , Pope John Paul II allowed a team of international researchers to analyse the shroud to settle the debate once and for all.
Researchers from the US, the UK and from Switzerland took samples of the cloth for radiocarbon dating. The pieces of cloth were all dated back to the 13th and 14 centuries, leading the scientists to conclude the shroud was forged in the Middle Ages. But a new paper published in the Oxford University journal Archaeometry has challenged the validity of the methods used in the original study.
- American Catholics in Transition;
- Understanding Customers (Marketing Series: Student)!
- Scientific Examinations and Bombshell Revelations;
- We Are All Moors: Ending Centuries of Crusades against Muslims and Other Minorities.
- Self-Loathing for Beginners!
- Perfection Of The Morning.
In the new study, however, researchers argued the method was flawed because it did not analyse the shroud as a whole. The news study was penned following a successful lawsuit to gain access to the original data collected in In , in response to a legal request, all raw data kept by the British Museum were made accessible. The researchers believe in order to prove whether the shrine is real or not, the entire cloth needs to be analysed.
Over the years, the shroud has been at the centre of fierce debate concerning its authenticity.
Shroud of Turin Isn’t Jesus’ Burial Cloth, Claims Forensic Study
In , scientists in Switzerland, England and the United States carbon-dated the Shroud of Turin and concluded that it originated in the Middle Ages between and In , scientists in Italy used infrared light and spectroscopy to date it between B. Garlaschelli, a co-author of the recent forensic study who works at the University of Pavia in Italy, has also published research on the Shroud of Turin before. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! Twice a week we compile our most fascinating features and deliver them straight to you.
This Day In History. What Did Jesus Look Like? What Other Proof Exists?